Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 7-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Burn , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Cauldron , Gruul Counters , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Forge , Gruul Leyline , Gruul Surprise , Izzet Spellslingers , Jund Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Questing Druid ranks #145 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 36%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Questing Druid is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 25.90 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Questing Druid has a win rate of 76.2%, making it 2.0% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roxanne, Starfall Savant | Legendary Creature — Cat Druid | 6 | 92.9% | 5 |
| Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 5 | 81.4% | 3 |
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 5 | 77.4% | 2 |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 9 | 74.5% | 3 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 26 | 67.9% | 12 |
| Hearth Elemental | Creature — Elemental // Sorcery — Adventure | 13 | 67.6% | 3 |
| Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 23 | 66.8% | 5 |
| Torch the Witness | Sorcery | 55 | 65.0% | 10 |
| Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 5 | 60.0% | 1 |
| Barbed Batterfist | Artifact — Equipment | 43 | 60.0% | 6 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Questing Druid than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turn Inside Out | Instant | 1 | 8 | 87.8% | 76.5% | +11.2% |
| Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 7 | 87.8% | 76.6% | +11.2% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 84.6% | 75.1% | +9.5% |
| Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 2 | 9 | 86.4% | 77.6% | +8.8% |
| Case of the Crimson Pulse | Enchantment — Case | 3 | 6 | 82.8% | 74.1% | +8.6% |
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 3 | 5 | 82.4% | 77.3% | +5.0% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 25 | 81.5% | 76.9% | +4.6% |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 12 | 78.9% | 75.3% | +3.6% |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 20 | 79.6% | 76.1% | +3.6% |
| Might of the Meek | Instant | 1 | 15 | 79.6% | 76.6% | +3.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 1964 | 94.6% | 47.5% |
| Temur Otters | 258 | 76.8% | 42.8% |
| Gruul Leyline | 123 | 65.1% | 55.5% |
| Red Deck Wins | 87 | 6.3% | 39.0% |
| Gruul Delirium | 31 | 20.5% | 28.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.